WebStack

Annotated docs/paths-opaque.html

503:5e29854fe10d
2005-11-15 paulb [project @ 2005-11-15 15:46:01 by paulb] Added has_key method.
paulb@357 1
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
paulb@327 2
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
paulb@327 3
<head>
paulb@327 4
  <title>Using the Path as an Opaque Reference into an Application</title>
paulb@357 5
  <meta name="generator"
paulb@357 6
 content="amaya 8.1a, see http://www.w3.org/Amaya/" />
paulb@328 7
  <link href="styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
paulb@327 8
</head>
paulb@327 9
<body>
paulb@327 10
<h1>Using the Path as an Opaque Reference into an Application</h1>
paulb@327 11
<p>Since many Web applications have complete control over how paths are
paulb@357 12
interpreted, the form of the path doesn't necessarily have to follow
paulb@357 13
any
paulb@357 14
obvious structure as far as users of your application is concerned.
paulb@357 15
Here's an
paulb@327 16
example:</p>
paulb@327 17
<pre>/000251923572ax-0015</pre>
paulb@357 18
<p>Many people would argue that such obscure references, whilst
paulb@357 19
perfectly
paulb@357 20
acceptable to machines, would make any application counter-intuitive
paulb@357 21
and very
paulb@357 22
difficult to reference. However,&nbsp;application developers sometimes
paulb@357 23
do not want people
paulb@327 24
"bookmarking" resources or functions within an application, and so such
paulb@327 25
concerns don't matter to them.</p>
paulb@327 26
</body>
paulb@327 27
</html>